The Ministress of Truth is proposing to hire an army of government-employee reply apparatchik to police the discourse on Twitter.
Literally everything this woman says is a lie and the exact opposite of free speech. She wants to control everyone she d…
The Ministress of Truth is proposing to hire an army of government-employee reply apparatchik to police the discourse on Twitter.
Literally everything this woman says is a lie and the exact opposite of free speech. She wants to control everyone she disagrees with:
"And I am eligible for it because I am verified. But there are a lot of people who shouldn't be verified, who aren't legit in my opinion, I mean they are real people but they aren't trustworthy. [Quelle Surprise: everyone I disagree with isn't eligible!!]
Anyway, verified people can essentially start to edit Twitter the same sort of way Wikipedia is to add context to certain tweets. So, just as an easy example, not from any political standpoint, if President Trump were still on Twitter and tweeted a claim about voter fraud, someone could add context... so that people have a fuller picture rather than an individual claim on a tweet."
Universal mental retardation alert: Masks on zoom meetings should be automatic disqualification from participation in voting. On anything. Ever.
--------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial
