Investigative journalist Harry Vox explains in this short video from 2014 the ruling class agenda and the Rockefeller scenarios which we are now experiencing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuOxG-rnj30&fbclid=IwAR0V2ZAvB1b9sdu0eyATpKF0TxvrSoWmMWYrbqbQIQPAqvqtxsWgrxzliUM
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development : The Rockefeller Foundation
http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf
One of the things missing from the elites' toolkit of total control are quarantines and curfews.
Welcome to the new world. This is a more invasive way for the ruling class to control.
Please read page 18 written in 2010
“LOCK STEP Scenario Narratives A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.”
“The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic recovery. China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.
Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power. At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.”
If you want to live in a world tricked into giving up freedom for safety, be apathetic and do nothing.
Please take action and do something about this and we can beat the ruling class, they do not have your families best interests at heart.
Benjamin Franklin once said: “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty or safety.”
