Flat Earth TRUTH

Awesome video here from a fellow flat earther who is also looking for the TRUTH, not reassurance in a flawed model. Was gonna post up a few clips from this video about the flaws of our AE circle, one-poled, flat earth model. But figured I would just post the entire video for you guys instead. ☺

It's obvious, if you put real time and effort into uncovering TRUTH, that our one-poled flat earth model is FAR from accurate. As I've stated FAR too many times, we DO have a south pole (no golemspeaks, I don't know the physical location ), south pole star, and a southern axis point for stars to rotate at. Southern hemisphere even experiences the "southern lights", which is the southern version of Aurora Borealis, aka the Northern Lights. This right here is smoking gun evidence of a south pole all in itself.

But all these southern occurrences we are simply told does not exist on the "offical" flat earth model, aka, the AE azimuthal equidistant. We are told to deny observable evidence because it does not match with the model pushed by ALL popular/mainstream flat earthers.

And well, that's not doing anyone any good. For flat earthers, denying our obvious reality makes us look silly, or uninformed. It honestly feels like this map and model was only created, and pushed so heavily, do that we'll never be taken seriously. Because anyone who honestly believes we only have one point of rotation for stars, one pole, is simply not acknowledging reality. And continuing to overlook our reality, will only bring us criticism.

We don't have to act like we have it all figured out, and that is the case for me. As I always say, I have no idea how it works. It's God's creation, only God knows.

So, be wary of those who claim to have it all figured out...

As this video will show, and I have explained numerous times.

The Azimuthal Equidistant, one-poled model of flat earth, is not accurate, and anyone who pushes the model as being THE official flat earth model, is either not yet informed of these flaws, or knowingly deceiving.

Sub to Richard Kallberg for more!
https://m.youtube.com/@RichardKallberg

🙏

So before we start, let me just say...yes the Earth is flat and motionless, with a small local sun over top of us. Definitely not a spinning space ball. But the AE/one-poled model, that everyone likes to teach as though it is the truth, is anything but the truth. There are numerous points as to why it is not accurate, one being the length of the tropics...

On the AE/circle model, we're told that the Tropic of cancer is smallest, and the Tropic Of Capricorn is the largest. Nearly twice as big as Cancer.

The problem is, when you calculate the actual size of these tropics, and the speed that the sun must move at in order to make one full rotation in a day, as he did in this video, the numbers just do not make any sense at all...

For instance, the Tropic Of Capricorn is over 79,000km long. Meaning, the sun would have to travel at over 3,200km per hour in order to pull off one full rotation!

I don't know about you, but the sun seems to move at a fairly slow speed from my experience, I've never seen it move at speeds faster than a speeding jet, like the AE model implies... 😕

Sub to Richard Kallberg for more!
https://m.youtube.com/@RichardKallberg

🙏

My fellow flat earthers, I know it seems like a popular statement amongst us to outright deny the existence of the dreaded "south pole", as we're told that the south pole is really just an ice wall that surrounds the entirety of us....

And most of us subscribe to this idea that the ONLY pole star is Polaris, and ALL the stars just rotate around Polaris.

I used to think this was the case myself, I heard Eric Dubay and some other well known flat earthers say it, and I didn't really look into it too much myself. I kinda just trusted their word...

But what if I told you there really WAS a southern pole/pole star, similar to Polaris, but in the Southern Hemisphere?

It is in fact, called Sigma Octantis, you can even view the time lapse photos/videos yourself. It's acts just like Polaris, but it's located in the Southern Hemisphere.

This by no means disproves flat earth. It does blow some big holes into the azimuthal equidistant model. Aka, THE flat earth model, as Eric Dubay puts it.

It's flat and motionless. WE'RE NOT on a spinning space rock, that is the most important part to all this. Details and specifics are really insignificant. I just don't like seeing people be deceived.

🙏

Another good clip here from the "circle flat earth model is wrong" video. This one talks about the flaws in the length of tropics when comparing documented video evidence of the moon travelling faster over the equator. It moves faster over the equator because for whatever reason or another, it has further to travel, which is obviously not the case with the circle flat earth, or "Gleasons" model. The tropic of Capricorn is the furthest distance on the circle model, therefore it should travel fastest over the Tropic Of Capricorn...but it doesn't. An obvious flaw in the circle model, and that is the piece of evidence that really woke me up to all of this.

Then we have some flight times which make no sense on the Gleasons AE model unless it was flying at a ridiculous, unachievable speed.

And like I said in the previous videos, I know it's a lot to take in at first, especially after we've grown so accustomed to our circle flat earth model, which seemed so perfect. But in the search for the true shape of our earth, truth must aways remain at the forefront, therefore if any flaw in the model or new piece of evidence comes forward, you must reassess and come to a new conclusion...

By now, if anything, we should all know not to get too attached to a particular model. Don't let that be the case here either, if you are to blinded by cognitive dissonance you're no better than anyone pushing the globe lie.

Sub to Daz Nez for more videos on this subject!
https://m.youtube.com/user/puremusicdaz/videos

🙏

Clip taken from the "why the circle Flat Earth model is wrong" video I posted. If you've watched that video, then hopefully you've came to the realization that the Gleason's AE, or circle flat earth model that most people use, is inaccurate when you really start to look at the facts. In this video here we take a look at how the easily observable, and we'll documented daylight hours, make absolutely no sense when using the Gleason's AE, or circle flat earth model.

As stated in the last couple of videos, I know this will probably come as a shock to most flat earth believers. But when trying to really uncover the truth about the shape and nature of our earth, truth NEEDS to remain at the forefront. If something does not make sense on a current model, like the globe, or in this case, the round flat earth model, then you acknowledge these flaws, and come to a new conclusion based off of findings.

Ignoring obvious flaws in your model is the exact same thing globe believers do. I know it can be hard to abandon your whole concept and views on the shape of the earth, but if you've learned anything so far, it is not to get too attached to a specific model.

"All I'm offering is the truth. Nothing more."

Sub to Daz Nez for more obscure, eye opening videos like this.
https://m.youtube.com/user/puremusicdaz/videos

🙏

So, turns out quite a few people have also noticed the errors of the AE model/map of our flat earth. And it was actually quite a popular topic a few years back to discuss the various, possible models of flat earth. Nowadays though, it seems like everyone is just agreeing to the same model, where we only have one pole, and ALL the stars just rotate around the so-called "only" pole star, at the very center, just like a big clock...

But as I've stated before, and these videos here go in depth to explain, these claims about our AE model simply do NOT match what we observe in reality.

We do in fact have a south pole star/a SECOND axis point in the southern hemisphere.

This alone tells us our AE model is completely wrong.

Flat earthers in the deep southern hemisphere have actually documented the direction of the sun when it sets, and it does not match with the AE model at all.

For instance, someone in this video here who lives in Australia recorded the direction of the sun set, and the sun was heading southwest...which obviously does not match up. It should have been WAY further north, on the AE layout.

Another good point, which I didn't even know until editing this video, are the "Southern lights".

Yes that's right, you've probably heard of the Northern lights, right? But how about the SOUTHERN lights?

We get the EXACT same phenomenon in the southern hemisphere, near the south pole, that we get in the northern hemisphere at the north pole.

They are called Aurora Australis and they're the exact same as Aurora Borealis, aka the northern lights.

Then I also included some footage of someone going over the hidden symbology and numerology of the AE model, specifically the mysterious Gleason's "new standard map of the world."

I can't vouch for any of the numerology stuff here, some of it may be a reach, or just a coincidence. I just found it interesting!

Clips used here are from..

"The Strange Truth Project"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kj-W5jB1Nv4

"End Of The Fake Flat Earth"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yuRfzT8F5rM&t

"Flat Earth - 20 Things wrong with the AE model"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r51aPK-MtWQ

Darren Nesbit new horizon Saint Annes
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KiL7Vvq6koIT/

🙏

First off.. Yes, the earth is flat, this is not an anti-flat earth post. And i know Dubay has taught us alot, but he is wrong when it comes to this. Dont be a victim of your own cognitive dissonance, please. If you think i am wrong, lets discuss it in the comments. 🙏

Now with that being said, lets get to it.

I saw that Eric Dubay recently posted his video, "How The Southern Stars Work On Flat Earth", over on his Rumble channel. I gave it a watch, and immediately had to comment and inform people of the lies being told. But i felt compelled to do even more than that, so i made this video to try to help wake up even more people.

Too long has this AE/single poled model been entertained as "fact", and taught as the "official flat earth model". The errors are just too blatant and obvious to EVER be taken serious. It should NEVER have gotten to the point it is at now, where if you even question it, people call you a shill.

The AE map is not even a flat earth map... all it is, is a projection of the "globe".

All it is, is the "globe" model, flattened down, with the North Pole placed at the center...

And the "globe" model, is just the standard Mercator map wrapped around a ball.

All these maps/models (AE &the globe) are based around the MERCATOR map. They're just different layouts...

😐

It feels like we are amidst an information war within the Flat Earth community. A battle for truth... and the community as a whole, is losing, because almost everyone teaches and believes in this flawed/wrong model.

It's like it's been purposefully hijacked...

But that's a whole 'nother video right there! 😊

🙏

Good little clip here from the last video I posted. Have you ever wondered why the single-poled flat earth model has been so heavily promoted? Or why we've been seeing so much subliminal messaging/programming to get us to think that we live under a dome? The dome enclosed model isn't exactly censored on YouTube either. If you do a search for flat earth, the top 3 search results all feature the dome model in the thumbnail.

ALL mainstream flat earth youtubers promote the circle, dome model. And the amount of movies that feature a dome enclosed world are almost too many too count at this time, Hunger Games, The Giver, The Simpsons, "Under the Dome", Dark City, etc. So just WHY is this one poled, dome enclosed circle model promoted so heavily?

Well, watch this video and find out for yourself...

Sub to Richard Kallberg for more!
https://m.youtube.com/@RichardKallberg

🙏

Alright ladies and gentlemen, got an interesting clip here taken from one of Dave Marsh's videos. First he does a brief rundown on the different flat earth models, and theories that are out there. Because if you didn't know, there is more than one flat earth model. EVERYONE knows the pizza pan azimuthal model, right? It's the only model that I have seen promoted amongst the well known flat earthers, and for good reason. Flight paths for the most part, seem to make more sense when compared to the traditional mercator style map we all grew up with.

One of the problems with this map though, that some people have pointed out (only to get called shills), is the length of Tropics. On the azimuthal equidistant (AE) map projection, the tropic of Cancer is the shortest in length, second is the equator, and the longest tropic at nearly twice the length of Cancer, is the Tropic Of Capricorn.

Using this knowledge, it's safe and logical to assume that when the moon is in the Tropic of Cancer, it should move the slowest. And when it is in the Tropic of Capricorn, it should move at the fastest speed...almost twice as fast, right?

So, let's test that out then...

Here he uses the "Zetetic Method" to measure the speed of the moon, to which he gets some intriguing results.

As the video shows, the moon is obviously not travelling twice as fast when in the Tropic Of Capricorn, as it should be. In fact, the moon moves SLIGHTLY faster when it is above the equator.

This obviously makes no sense on the azimuthal equidistant, or Gleasons model.

I hope we can all agree on that, it is in fact, observable documented evidence. This isn't the first time he's done this test either, he's conducted it on 3 separate occasions, each time getting the same result.

My only intention here is to spread truth. Not cause division.

If you feel pointing this out causes division, you may unfortunately just be a victim of your own cognitive dissonance...

We're all flat earth believers here, we don't all have to agree to the same model to be considered a "flat earther", now do we?

And for the record, I have no model that I currently subscribe too. The earth is flat, and we're not on a spinning ball flying through an infinite space. That is the main point to all of this. The rest is really insignificant.

I just hate seeing falsities being spread as though it were truth, which is the reasoning for exposing this.

Sub to Dave marsh for more!
https://m.youtube.com/user/mellosoft

🙏

Okay ladies and gentlemen, time to be honest here with our good friend the Gleasons AE map, aka the flat earth map. So in our search for uncovering the truth about the true shape and nature of our earth, truth needs to remain at the forefront. I'm sure we can all agree on that, right? So, if a concept or model has flaws such as the globe earth, then we figure out what the flaws are, and come to a new conclusion based off of findings.

In this case, we seem to have some flaws and errors with the Gleasons, or Azimuthal Equidistant map. Such as, some southern flights making no sense at all in the time frame were told, unless the plane flew at ridiculous impossible to achieve speeds. And the length of the tropics and equator on the Gleasons make no sense either.

It has been observed and documented that when the moon is over the equator it moves faster, because for whatever reason or another, it has a further distance to travel. But on the Gleason's or AE (flat, circle), the Tropic of Capricorn is the furthest in distance, which makes no sense.

Globers will say this is proof of a globe, no it is proof that we have a LOT more to learn and uncover regarding our earth. If we we were on a globe we would have CURVATURE and as has been repeatedly proven, there is no curve, we're definitely on a flat plane. But it also seems like our current round circle AE map might not quite be accurate either...

If we have learned anything at all on our path to uncovering the flat earth truth, it should be to not get too attached to a model.

You may reject this at first, as I did. When i first heard this i watched some of it but had to turn it off, my cognitive dissonance was too strong, I didn't want my model taken away again! But overtime what he says here really resonated with me, and I found myself coming back to it... And now that the cognitive dissonance is gone, I see what he's saying for the truth it is.

"All I'm offering is the truth. Nothing more."

And let make it clear. Im not pushing his model or theory. The purpose of this video is to wake people up to the flaws of the azimuthal model, which do not coincide with reality.

Sub to Darren Nesbit aka Daz Nez for more! He's got a bunch more obscure flat earth videos, and talks a lot more about this subject.
https://m.youtube.com/user/puremusicdaz/videos

🙏

Good little clip here taken from the Dave Marsh presentation I posted. This one talks about the "electromagnetic aether" and the TWO "vortexes" in the sky, which he says look, and act, very similar to a magnetic field. The vortexes he's talking about are of course the northern and southern hemisphere axis points I talk about so often here. Polaris and Sigma Octantis.

This is the truth to our reality. Yes, we have a north pole, but we also have a south pole. Two hemispheres separated by an EQUAtor...

The equator (equal) is a point where the north and south hemispheres are EQUALLY divided. Which is obviously not the case on the AE circle model.

He then explains how the "electromagnetic aether" can be attributed to the path of the moon, as it's been shown that the moon does in fact follow the same path of the stars that surround it.

Sub to Dave Marsh for more!
https://m.youtube.com/user/mellosoft

🙏

Awesome presentation here from Dave Marsh from the Flat Earth International Conference that was in Denver, Colorado, back in 2018. Tons of information in this one, for both the beginner, and the more experienced flat earther. Talks about the many experiments done to prove that we live on a flat, motionless plane, as well as the many other proofs to prove that there is no curvature at all.

Although the main focus of this presentation is the moon. Dave has a lot of great videos on the moon on his channel, as he's spent a LOT of time observing the moon, it's speed, cycles, lunar phases, and many other interesting aspects regarding the moon. He's a wealth of knowledge on the subject.

If any of my fellow flat earthers had any questions regarding the moon, I recommend checking this out.

Sub to Dave Marsh for more!
https://m.youtube.com/@mellosoft

🙏

So I'm sure all of my fellow flat earthers out there have, at one point or another, seen the video explaining how the 1958 Encyclopedia entry that talks about a "dome", is actually talking about THE Dome Firmament...

The encyclopedia gives co-ordinate for its location, and even gives us a rough estimate of its height.

Ever since I first heard this, and saw the video... I was very skeptical. It seemed a little odd to me, that a mass produced encyclopedia would actually mention a dome firmament, as mentioned in the bible...

Genesis 1:
6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven.

And what seemed even more odd to me, was the height it was at, 13,000 feet.

It seemed pretty low for a physical barrier (a dome) to be, so I decided to do some digging into this for myself, to see what I could uncover.

Because if I know anything regarding flat earth, I know it is riddled with misinformation/disinformation.

If you've been a regular viewer of mine, hopefully you understand by now that the azimuthal equidistant, single-poled model, promoted by nearly ALL popular flat earthers, is FAR from being accurate. There are far too many issues with it to ever be taken seriously. The big, most obvious, and easily debunkable being... WE HAVE TWO POLES/TWO POLE STARS.

So, could this possibly be another bit of misinformation within the flat earth community? Or perhaps just an error on the part of TerryEicher (flat out truth) Or...is this REALLY a mention of a dome firmament?

Watch and find out for yourself...

🙏

And just so there is no confusion...

Yes, we're flat as far as the eye can see, we do NOT live on a spinning globe.

☺

Amazing footage here, rarely seen footage taken from inside the cockpit of an airplane. Watch as he pans the camera from side to side, so you can really get a good grasp and understanding that we do in fact, live on a flat PLANE earth, NOT a globe.

Flat as far as the eye can see... definitely no 8 inch drop per Sq. mile, like we're told there is.

If it isn't apparent by this video, and you haven't woken up to the truth yet, we do not live on a spinning ball, orbiting a gigantic sun.

Our earth is flat, and our sun is much smaller than were told. It simply travels over top our of earth, as this video shows here, and many others as well.

Time to wake up to the truth.

Original footage taken from Pilot LX. A TRUE pilot (unlike seatwarmer), and a TRUE flat earther. Check out his Facebook page for more videos like this!
https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1282388697

🙏

Awesome POV footage here taken from an airplane, showcasing our flat, plane earth. Watch as this plane flies over top an obviously flat earth, making multiple stops to different locations scattered throughout.

Notice how the horizon always rises up to meet the eye, and never does the plane fly downward to compensate for a supposed curvature. The only time it pitches down is when it goes in for landing...

So globe believers..where is the curve? And why does the horizon always rise to meet the eye?

Welcome to our flat, PLANE, Earth. 😊

Welcome to reality.

HUGE thanks to Cloudsurfer for capturing this footage! Give him a sub for more awesome POV plane footage like this.
https://m.youtube.com/@cloudsurfer

And sub to MGTV for more!
https://m.youtube.com/@mgtvtruth

🙏

Super interesting, and informative video here from MGTV. This one takes a look into the sudden appearance, and mysterious origins of "Mark Sargent" within the flat earth movement. MGTV does a great little expose here, explaining how the person known as "Mark Sargent", kind of just erupted out of nowhere around 2015 with his "clues" videos, and an app that was already created, and ready to go, right when the whole flat earth movement REALLY started to take off. He couldn't have timed his introduction any better, almost as if it was all pre-planned....😞

Same goes for Patricia Steere. Both Mark and Patricia emerged around the same time, both had apps created by the same company..and both are obviously close associates who are also BIG names within the Flat Earth community. Highly promoted people, especially during their heyday of 2015-2016.

And once you really start to do some digging, and find out that their website domains and apps were all created BEFORE they even looked into flat earth, well that's when things REALLY get interesting.

Although this video doesn't focus much on the app creation date, that is brought up in another video, which I will be posting as well.

Stay tuned!

"The best way to control the opposition, is to lead it ourselves".
- Lenin

Give MGTV Truth a sub for more!
https://m.youtube.com/@mgtvtruth5532

🙏

Good little clip here taken from "The Strange Truth Project". Talks about startrails, which would be impossible on a spinning globe flying through space. And the amount of movement we are supposed to undergoing at this very second. 67 million miles per hour, spinning 1000mph on our axis, while orbiting a sun at 66,600mph. Thats a LOT of movement, so why do our stars never change? Common sense and observation tells us that we are stationary, motionless. So why are we taught that we are on a globe?

And just how biblically accurate is the globe model?

Well, you may be surprised...

Clip taken from "The Strange Truth Project".
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kj-W5jB1Nv4

🙏

Awesome documentary here from MIG MAG, aka Johnny Cirucci. This one is on the history of the Roman Catholic church, the Jesuit order, Freemasons, and the globe earth lie that they all helped to bring forth onto the masses. Also talks of all the ridiculous theories that they introduced to the science community, such as gravity, the big bang, and of course the spinning ball earth lie, as well as their obsession they seem to have with keeping people from uncovering the truth...

All this and MUCH more!

Sub to MIG MAG for more.
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCyOcJ4jSWoLV6cy0gibbnOQ

🙏

(Dont worry, the Earth is flat. But was it intentionally leaked to the public? Watch and find out..)

Good video here from ODD TV, talks about the possibility that Flat Earth was a controlled leak... ODD TV does a good little rundown and points out some strange coincidences surrounding rapper B.O.B. and his gofundme page to fund a satellite to space..to prove the flat earth.

The timing with it was right around when flat earth really started to gain popularity...

And almost immediately after the post, a bunch of NASA astronauts even commented on it, bringing even MORE attention to it. Almost as if it was all pre-planned. Ala, the hegelian dialectic...

He also talks of all the predictive programming we see in movies, having to do with a dome enclosed world, and the AE/azimuthal equidistant map.

What ODD TV doesn't touch on, is the possibility that flat earth was a controlled leak so that they could hijack it, and control the movement with their FALSE map and model, and get everyone to believe it as THE "official flat earth model". Just like Eric Dubay always tells us...😐

The model with TOO many blatant flaws, as I've explained NUMEROUS times on this channel. There are simply too many flaws with it to EVER be taken seriously. Almost as if this was always the plan....

And I'm sure many people here have probably seen that illuminati card game, it was released many years ago, before the flat earth craze really took off. But did you know there there was a flat earth card included? Stating that "people laugh, but flat earthers know something".

This game was created in 1982...

They knew flat earth was going to be known at some point, so they hijacked it..took it over with this false model. Now if you even question this obviously false model, people call you a shill.

It appears their plan is working just as planned, unfortunately....

Sub to ODD TV for more!
https://m.youtube.com/c/ODDTV4REAL

🙏

Another awesome Sunday morning sermon here from the wonderful Pastor Dean Odle. This one talks about the infiltration of the flat earth community by deceivers, freemasons, and possible satanists. This might come as a surprise to some people out there, as many of these people are still popular, and well known within the flat earth community. But as I've stated before, in a sort of tongue in check kind of way, these people that many refer to as flat earth "gurus", are being FAR from honest with us, especially in regards to our AE/one-poled model of flat earth. I've always had a screaming suspicion that this model that is so heavily promoted, is part of some psy-op or controlled opposition, as there are too many blatant errors within it to ever be taken seriously...

Although that's not the subject of this video. This video is more about who these popular flat earthers REALLY are, and what they are REALLY teaching. People such as Patricia Steere, Mark Sargent, Marty Leeds, and others.

So sit back, get comfy, and enjoy another information packed Sunday morning service, courtesy of Pastor Dean. 😊

Make sure to give him a sub as well!
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/zGa4zokWZr7s/

🙏

So I got asked a few days ago if Dave Weiss was to be trusted or not. I wasn't quite sure, but I sure had my suspicions about him. It got me intrigued though, so I decided to do a search for any videos I could find. And lo and behold, I found this old video here from RV Truth and Richie From Boston talking about how they feel about our boy Dave Weiss, aka Mr "Deep inside the rabbit hole". In fact, they did a whole podcast centered around exposing Dave, and his obviously anti-biblical stance that he takes, and teaches to others. As well as pointing out a few other interesting facts as well. But I didn't feel like posting the whole podcast so I just clipped this part for you guys.

A lot of this is obviously just their speculation, but it is interesting nonetheless.

Heres a link to the original video (sort of), the youtube video got removed, but this link works, its just slow to load.

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=X247RGU5NW95

🙏

So, a strange thing happened to MGTV's YouTube channel after he posted that last video that I posted, of him exposing Mark Sargent's and Patricia Steere's link to Metatron... His YouTube channel got terminated! Seems like some people don't want this information out there for some reason...

Well, ODD TV has something to say about that. You see, he's had a screaming suspicion about these two (Sargent, Steere) for quite a long time, so he just had to drop in with his honest opinion on the whole situation.

He examines the video that got MGTV banned, examines the evidence provided and even drops a few more bits of information to further confirm MGTV's claims...

Turns out, he's known about their shadiness for quite a long time, and even dropped a song exposing these two in the past.

As I've said before, be careful of these people who sell apps that track you, and claim to be all knowing. Especially when the claims they make can be easily debunked...

Sub to ODD TV for more!
https://m.youtube.com/c/ODDTV4REAL

🙏

Short, but information packed video here on the Antarctica Voyages, and the people involved with them...

I've often heard people cite people like Captain Cook, as evidence of the ice wall, pointing to his expedition logs as proof... Or talking about Admiral Byrd and his TV appearances, where he talks of an untouched land mass full of resources, the size of USA...

But what most people don't seem to realize, is that most, if not all, of these people involved with Antarctic Voyages, and making these claims, are Freemasons...

And what do we do when we hear wild stories from known, admitted Freemasons?

Well we take everything they say with a HUGE grain of salt, because if anything, I'm sure we can all agree that high level Freemasons are far from honest to the public about their true intentions and motives...

SPOILER ALERT
:
:
:
Yes it's true, everybody's favourite Admiral, Richard E. Byrd was a Freemason, and even founded his own Freemason lodge down in Antarctica. Antarctic Lodge number 777...

He was also initiated into the Federal Lodge No. 1.

These are all documented facts, not exactly hard info to find. Here are a few links for proof.

https://freimaurer-wiki.de/index.php/En:_Antarctic_Lodge_No._777

http://www.federallodge.org/2011/11/20/admiral-richard-e-byrd-the-hero/

http://www.knightstemplar.org/KnightTemplar/articles/byrd.htm

http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/masonicmuseum/richard_byrd_fdc.htm

https://nymasoniclibrary.org/the-masons-and-the-antarctica-expedition/

Sub to Richard Kallberg for more!
https://m.youtube.com/@RichardKallberg

🙏

Clip taken from one of Flat Earth Asshole's old videos, aka Jake Gibson. This one again talks of the flaws of the Azimuthal Equidistant map, aka the "flat earth map". He talks about some videos that were put out by CoolHardLogic that successfully debunked the AE map, videos that no flat earthers even attempted to debunk...for obvious reasons. The only person who attempted to debunk it was Jake here, although he quickly regretted it. While it was impossible for CoolHardLogic to prove that we lived on a spinning globe, it was also impossible to defend the flawed Azimuthal Equidistant map.

Think of it, whenever someone attacks flat earth, it is the MODEL they attack, because it is onviously flawed. They NEVER are able to dispute the lack of curvature claims, or are never able to prove we live on a spinning ball... it's almost like the flawed map and model was only created, and pushed, to make the flat earth idea seem silly... 😕

Sub to Jake Gibson for more!
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCTlbjcTWjTLqNmcF3VL7Xag/videos

🙏

So I've been seeing alot of comments that are unsure as to why we seemingly have "opposite star rotations", in the northern and southern hemisphere, if we do in fact live on a flat earth. Alot of people seem to be hung up on this, so I figured I would compile a few videos that help to explain just that.

This should help to clear up any confusion for those globe earth believers, or those who are interested in pursuing the truth of our flat earth, who keep asking this question.

Hopefully this will also help to wake up my fellow flat earthers to the truth about this "single-poled" model that everyone seems to buy into. This model which only attracts ridicule, because it tries to tell us that we only have one pole, and one pole star, Polaris, which is flat out denying the reality that we all live in.

A model which scares off a LOT of people from pursuing the truth of our flat earth, because it is utter nonsense, as we OBVIOUSLY do have a South Pole, complete with its own star, Sigma Octantis.

Just because this single-poled model is promoted nearly everywhere, does not make it the truth.

Don't trust others to do the research for you, no matter how popular they are, or how many followers they have.

Do your own research. Compare this single poled model, to real world, documented observations, and the truth should become painfully obvious...

We are being lied to on so many levels...

🙏