Danish Professor: mRNA Vaccine Study Sends 'Danger Signals'
May 3, 2022
UnHerd
Freddie Sayers meets Professor Christine Stabell-Benn.
A new Danish study reveals disparities in all-cause mortality between mRNA and adenovirus vaccines. The results raise some difficult questions about the unexpected effects of the most popular COVID vaccines.
Freddie Sayers speaks to the study's author Prof. Christine Stabell-Benn, from the University of Southern Denmark, to find out more.
TIMECODES:
00:00
-
01:07
- Introduction
01:07
-
04:10
- Professor Christine explains her study
04:10
-
07:04
- What are the positives and negatives from this study?
07:04
-
11:45
- What is a non-live vaccine? Is it the same as a conventional vaccine?
11:45
-
15:11
- Further analysis of Professor Christine's study
15:11
-
18:34
- Looking at the chart from Professor Christine's study.
18:34
-
20:55
- What do the numbers surround the Pfizer-Moderna vaccines actually mean?
20:55
-
22:27
- With all the caveats from the study. How should we actually interpret it?
22:27
-
23:43
- Should we be taking these results more seriously?
23:43
-
29:54
- Is Professor Christine nervous to publish the findings of her study?
29:54
-
31:43
- What age group would Professor Christine recommend takes an mRNA vaccine?
31:43
-
33:41
- Has Professor Christine been vaccinated? And has she taken her study to mainstream media?
34:07
-
35:41
- Conclusion
#ChristineStabellBenn #mRNAvaccine #covid19
Original:
https://youtu.be/o_nKoybyMGg
Read the full study by Prof. Stabell-Benn:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072489
Read the supporting article:
https://unherd.com/thepost/study-into-mrna/
Listen to the podcast version:
https://shows.acast.com/lockdowntv-with-freddie-sayers/episodes/danish-professor-mrna-vaccine-study-sends-danger-signals
=
https://unherd.com
Follow UnHerd on social media:
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/unherd
URL
lbry://@ProgressiveTruthSeekers#3/Danish-Professor-mRNA-Vaccine-Study-Sends-Danger-Signals#d
Claim ID
d51c57c65df831517ce2ecc4f0f72c7b4fb7d8d4
252.58 MB
Less
0.01
1 comment
Say something about this...
Post
@davidlamson
21 hours ago
Scientific research is its own bubble, as gatekeepers deny both funding and publication to research considered contrarian. Scientists unaware of the bubble operate with incomplete, and often inaccurate, information. When Dr. John Ioaniddis published his 2008 paper, Why Most Research Findings are False, he was not condemning scientists, so much as the system that created and sustains the bubble. Any scientist in 2022 still unaware of that bubble is not paying enough attention to be a reliable source. Is this scientist aware of the deaths and harm caused by the MMR vaccine? Apparently not. Is she aware that all diseases now vaccinated for decreased by over 90% in the first half of the 20th century, prior to antibiotics or vaccines? Apparently not.
