First published at 23:46 UTC on May 6th, 2024.
Are we a nation of shop keepers or a nation of shoplifters? Newspaper column written by G.K. Chesterton for "The New Witness", under the heading "At the Sign of the World's End".
Chuck the TV and discover a whole new world …
MORE
Are we a nation of shop keepers or a nation of shoplifters? Newspaper column written by G.K. Chesterton for "The New Witness", under the heading "At the Sign of the World's End".
Chuck the TV and discover a whole new world where your imagination creates the pictures! http://Listen.ChestertonRadio.com
Enjoy our shows? Please consider joining our family:
https://www.ChuckTheTV.com
https://www.patreon.com/ChestertonRadio
https://www.SubscribeStar.com/ChestertonRadio
http://BuyMeACoffee.com/ChestertonRadio
Gilbert Keith Chesterton was an English writer, philosopher, lay theologian, and literary and art critic. He has been referred to as the "prince of paradox". Time magazine observed of his writing style: "Whenever possible Chesterton made his points with popular sayings, proverbs, allegories—first carefully turning them inside out."
Chesterton created the fictional priest-detective Father Brown, and wrote on apologetics. Even some of those who disagree with him have recognised the wide appeal of such works as Orthodoxy and The Everlasting Man. Chesterton routinely referred to himself as an "orthodox" Christian, and came to identify this position more and more with Catholicism, eventually converting to Catholicism from High Church Anglicanism. Biographers have identified him as a successor to such Victorian authors as Matthew Arnold, Thomas Carlyle, Cardinal John Henry Newman, and John Ruskin.
On his contributions, T. S. Eliot wrote:
"He was importantly and consistently on the side of the angels. Behind the Johnsonian fancy-dress, so reassuring to the British public, he concealed the most serious and revolutionary designs—concealing them by exposure ... Chesterton's social and economic ideas...were fundamentally Christian and Catholic. He did more, I think, than any man of his time—and was able to do more than anyone else, because of his particular background, development and abilities as a public performer—to maintain the existence of the important minority in..
LESS