You are about to action:

Object being modified by the action

Do you want to proceed?

Share Video Link

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GvXdJqenIUje/

Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.

Embed Video HTML

Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.

Share to Social Media

Share to social media by clicking on the quick share links.

Report Content

Reason

Please select the most appropriate reason from the list provided.

Note: For a more detailed description of each reason, see our Community Guidelines.

Additional Comments

Please add any additonal comments that will help with the assessment of your request.

Note: Copyright claims must contain all the items specified within the Copyright Policy.

Email Submissions

We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.

Thank you for submitting your report

We will investigate and take the appropriate action.

Add to Playlist

What Game Theory Reveals About Life, The Universe, and Everything

Next video playing soon

Click to cancel

Autoplay has been paused

Click to watch next video

First published at 22:03 UTC on May 2nd, 2024.

#cooperate
#defect
#forgive

#HUMANITYFIRST

BobMartin

subscribers

BitChute Advertisement

Cooperate or Defect? Tit for Tat -- Prisoner’s dilemma: imaginary situation employed in game theory. One version is as follows. Two prisoners are accused of a crime. If one confesses and the other does not, the one who confesses will be released immediately and the other will spend 20 years in prison. If neither confesses, each will be held only a few months. If both confess, they will each be jailed 15 years. They cannot communicate with one another. Given that neither prisoner knows whether the other has confessed, it is in the self-interest of each to confess himself. Paradoxically, when each prisoner pursues his self-interest, both end up worse off than they would have been had they acted otherwise. See egoism.

LESS