Repost from 17 April 2024 | David Irving ( 👉https://twitter.com/irving_books ) | What happens when history, law, and free speech intersect? Delve into the Irving Libel Trial... The Battle for Historical Accuracy
———source:————————————————————
▸ Source Twitter/X: 👉 https://twitter.com/irving_books/status/1780755111934930953
Outline:
00:00 The Challenges of Being a Controversial Historian
00:29 Encounters with Law Enforcement and Bans
03:17 Reflections on Free Speech and Historical Debate
05:31 The Power of the Internet in Historical Research
09:12 Legal Battles and the Fight for Historical Truth
24:00 Eyewitness Testimony and the Complexity of Historical Evidence
32:48 Questioning Historical Evidence
34:17 Legal Battles and Public Scrutiny
37:23 The High Cost of Losing in Court
42:13 The Appeal Process and Its Challenges
57:11 Reflections on Victory and Defeat
▸ About David Irving: (Note: Taken from ( 👉 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving ) but we all know it is edited and censored for the benefit of a certain tribe...)
David John Cawdell Irving (born 24 March 1938) is an English author who has written on the military and political history of World War II, especially Nazi Germany. He was found to be a Holocaust denier in a UK court in 2000 as a result of a failed libel case.
Irving's works include The Destruction of Dresden (1963), Hitler's War (1977), Churchill's War (1987), and Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich (1996). In his works, he argued that Adolf Hitler did not know of the extermination of Jews, or, if he did, he opposed it. Though Irving's negationist claims and views of German war crimes in World War II (and Hitler's responsibility for them) were never taken seriously by mainstream historians, he was once recognized for his knowledge of Nazi Germany and his ability to unearth new historical documents, which he held closely but stated were fully supportive of his conclusions. His 1964 book The Mare's Nest about Germany's V-weapons campaign of 1944-45 was praised for its deep research but criticized for minimizing Nazi slave labor programs.
By the late 1980s, Irving had placed himself outside the mainstream of the study of history and had begun to turn from "'soft-core' to 'hard-core' Holocaust denial", possibly influenced by the 1988 trial of Holocaust denier Ernst Zündel. That trial, and his reading of the pseudoscientific Leuchter report, led him to openly espouse Holocaust denial, specifically denying that Jews were murdered by gassing at the Auschwitz concentration camp.
Irving's reputation as a historian was further discredited in 2000, when, in the course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books, High Court Judge Charles Gray determined in his ruling that Irving willfully misrepresented historical evidence to promote Holocaust denial and whitewash the Nazis, a view shared by many prominent historians. The English court found that Irving was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist,[8] who "for his ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence". In addition, the court found that Irving's books had distorted the history of Hitler's role in the Holocaust to depict Hitler in a favorable light.
——— ➤✝️ "Page Chronicles" Channel & Operator |▸⚠️ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMERS———
📌 I do not own the ©️ Copyright / Licensing to this content but it is posted Under:
► Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”
☕️ Buy me a coffee: 👉 https://www.buymeacoffee.com/pagechronicles
🐦Page Chronicles X/Twitter: 👉 https://twitter.com/HelperPage
Community Guidelines Disclaimer: This video's point of view and purpose is not to bully or harass anybody but to share opinions and thoughts with like-minded individuals curious about this subject to encourage conversation and awareness.
