Nuremburg 2.0 - Crimes and Punishments - part 1

In this video and the next I want to put forward my views on what I think should happen to our Overlords.

Let’s, for the sake of this discourse, assume that the accusations that have been made against our Overlords are actually valid – I guess that this is not such a stretch of the imagination for some of us.

Let’s also assume that the proper procedure has been followed by which I mean; that formal enquiries into their behaviour were made by the Crime Prosecution Service; that the Police were subsequently instructed to carry out the appropriate investigations; (I dare say that given the serious nature of the accusations made against them, most of our Overlords would have already been apprehended by this time and so, would already be in custody) and that then, following those investigations, there was evidence enough against them to result in their being indicted; so, they were then formally charged with whatever crimes it’s judged that they were believed to have committed, and then, they were prosecuted for those crimes. And then, they were tried in a court of law and, if they were found guilty (having crossed the required threshold of proof being beyond any reasonable doubt), then, they were duly sentenced.

As I’m sure all of you listening to this are already aware the above trial has been colloquially termed, Nuremberg 2.0.

I should say that, to my way of thinking, these people should be subject to the rule of law. Moreover, for me, it’s absolutely essential that the rule of law be properly adhered to. Not only must Justice be done in a correct manner, it has to be seen to be carried out in a correct manner. As far as I’m concerned, there can be no hint of any impropriety because the trials conducted can not be dismissed as being “show trials”.

In the next video I will talk about what punishment they should (or rather shouldn’t) receive.

Wise up and rise up