Time Stamps
00:43 - Contagion Myth | Koch's Postulates
2:49 - Contagion Myth | River's Postulates
5:39 - Bradford Hill Criteria
10:30 - CV19 Gold Syrian Hamster study Koch's Postulate Lip Service(Not actually done)
10:55 - Denying Koch's Postulates Is Scientism, Not Science.
11:55 - Become your own thought expert
12:30 - None of sars-cov-2/covid-19 seminal studies attempted real purification
13:25 - The coronavirus family are mischaracterized exosome cell culture screenshot fairy tales
13:47 - Exosomes are pleomorphic(adaptive shape-shifting) detox system stem cell like extracellular vesicles.
14:28 - What could be the "vaccines" be for?
14:57 - The ultimate data profile - brain/body mapping 5G-vaccine-smart device dragnet.
15:00 - Stealing hidden knowledge about the human body
16:47 - How Biology is flawed...knowing nothing about consciousness...
17:18 - The Technological And Cultural Climate Of Biological Remote Control
18:18 - Creepy 2019 Transhumanist Education book targeting ages 11-13
24:15 - Dr. Carrie Madej on Stew Peters (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson Microscope Results)
25:32 - Dr. Robert Young electron microscopy claims to prove graphene oxide in vaccines
26:50 - Ricardo Delgado, Spanish Researcher corroborating graphene oxide in vaccines
27:30 - Virology is fraud, the bigger picture and Terrain Theory, getting people focusing on a singular problem(Sars-cov-2's pseudo isolation that undermines every aspect of the covid-19 narrative with utter scientific lethality).
References:
0. The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (including "Coronavirus") Are Not the Cause of Disease. Pgs. 3-4 by Thomas S. Cowan MD, Sally Fallon Morell (This is not an affiliate link)
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/contagion-myth-thomas-s-cowan-md/1137427415
The Three Seminal Studies using scientific fraud to falsely claim the existence and pathogenicity of Sars-Cov-2:
1. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China | Nature
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
2. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 | NEJM
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2001017
3. Eurosurveillance | Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR
https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045
--------
A. U.S. CDC via FDA . gov
(pg.42 "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed")
("In Silico" occurs 10x throughout the document)
CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel - Instructions for Use
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
B. Chinese CDC
"They didn't isolate the virus, that's the issue. It doesn't mean anything if you only tested positive. I do not suspect it's coming from what we originally thought"
Just after 13min 27 sec mark on an NBC Nightly News Broadcast (Full) - January 23rd, 2021 | NBC Nightly News
https://youtu.be/TjjA-8JXzYI?t=807
C. https://www.facebook.com/TalkinTurkeyWithTomCowan/photos/a.107639898165334/123665053229485/
"The electron micrograph image above, taken from a cell culture, is what virologists present as evidence of the existence of SARS-CoV-2. However, according to a paper titled "Appearances Can Be Deceiving — Viral-Like Inclusions in COVID-19 Negative Renal Biopsies by Electron Microscopy," published in the August 2020 issue of the journal Kidney360, researchers found IDENTICAL particles in people who were "negative for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as well as in renal biopsies from the pre-COVID-19 era." The paper's authors list "a number of potential natural mimickers that can generate groups of round vesicles mimicking SARS-CoV-2 virions ..."
In other words, well before the COVID era, and in patients who did not have COVID or tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, researchers were finding "vesicles" that were indistinguishable from
SARS-CoV-2. These findings affirm what I and others have been saying for more than a year: These particles, labeled as SARS-CoV-2, are actually normal components of dead and dying tissues. They are not pathogenic viruses. Another bombshell from this paper: In a "detailed, ultrastructural study" from 2003, the CDC acknowledged that "SARS-CoV" particles (supposedly responsible for the 2003 SARS outbreak) could not be distinguished from "normal cellular components." This means that the CDC knew in 2003 that the images they were calling coronaviruses were nothing other than "normal cellular components."
D. The Bradford Hill considerations on causality: a counterfactual perspective
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291382/
E. Bradford Hill criteria - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradford_Hill_criteria
